A) The owner of the parking lot is liable for conversion. She took John's car without his consent.
B) The parking lot owner has a qualified privilege for towing the car since it was a business necessity.
C) Even though John left his car in the parking lot under emergency conditions, he still committed a trespass on the owner's property.
D) All the above are correct.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Angela will be able to submit the additional medical bills to the court for payment.
B) Tom will have to pay the additional medical bills.
C) Tom will have a qualified privilege and only have to pay a portion of the additional medical expenses.
D) Angela will have no recourse against Tom or the court for the medical expenses as long as the original award was reasonable.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) committed tortious interference with a contract.
B) committed tortious interference with a prospective advantage.
C) committed a battery.
D) caused a breach of contract and committed the tort of intrusion.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) can reasonably detain the customer for suspicion of shoplifting.
B) cannot detain the customer but can alert the police.
C) cannot detain the customer but once the customer leaves the store, the salesclerk can make a citizen's arrest.
D) cannot detain the customer but can sue for conversion.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) larceny.
B) trespass.
C) misrepresentation.
D) conversion.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Trein is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
B) Mia is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
C) E-presto is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
D) Both Mia and E-presto are liable for tortious interference with a contract.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) does not violate the Lanham Act because of the First Amendment freedom of speech.
B) does not violate the Lanham Act because Wholesome did not act with actual malice.
C) does not violate the Lanham Act because comparative ads are exempt from the law.
D) violates the Lanham Act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff.
B) the defendant intended a certain physical act which ends up injuring someone.
C) injuries are caused to someone because of the defendant's neglect or oversight.
D) there is resulting punishment, including prison, for the defendant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ann defamed Brian.
B) Ann committed the tort of trespass.
C) Ann committed the tort of interference with a prospective advantage.
D) Ann committed the tort of battery.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, as his conduct was intentional.
B) Yes, but only if Adam intended to cause Linda serious emotional distress.
C) No, since he was only playing a practical joke.
D) No, since Linda was not physically hurt by Adam.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 45
Related Exams